top of page
WORLD_ARBITRATION_COURT_The_Supranational_Authority

The Power of WAC: Enforcing Justice Under Universal Jurisdiction

A Court Without Borders, A Mandate Without Permission

World Arbitration Court – Sovereign & Supranational Authority


Under the Blockchain Foundation Convention, the World Arbitration Court Founding Articles, and the Universal Jurisdiction Doctrine recognized in customary international law, the WAC operates as a sovereign arbitration authority whose Tokenized Arbitration Awards (WTAAs) are binding, final, and globally enforceable without recourse to domestic court reversal.


Pursuant to the Hague Apostille Convention, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, and the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, all duly issued and apostilled WAC Awards require direct enforcement without re-litigation or judicial review.


Any attempt to obstruct, delay, or alter enforcement constitutes a breach of treaty obligations and an actionable violation under WAC’s post-jurisdictional enforcement framework.

 

In an era where national courts are politically compromised, and international tribunals are structurally paralyzed, the World Arbitration Court (WAC) rises as the first sovereign legal institution to enforce justice beyond permission—through a post-jurisdictional framework rooted in the doctrine of Universal Jurisdiction.

WAC was not created to wait for consent.
It was created to evoke the sovereign right of justice itself.

What Is Universal Jurisdiction?

Universal Jurisdiction is a legal doctrine recognized in customary international law which allows a court to prosecute crimes regardless of where they were committed, the nationality of the perpetrator, or the nationality of the victim.

 

It traditionally applies to the most serious crimes affecting the international community:

  • Genocide

  • Crimes against humanity

  • War crimes

  • Enforced disappearances

  • Systematic torture or trafficking

 

Universal Jurisdiction is the acknowledgment that some crimes are so severe, they are not the concern of one nation—but of all humanity.

How WAC Applies Universal Jurisdiction in Practice

The World Arbitration Court has codified, expanded, and weaponized the principle of Universal Jurisdiction through Tokenized Arbitration Awards (WTAAs)—blockchain-anchored legal instruments that convert universal crimes into enforceable monetary claims.

WAC’s legal engine draws from:

  • UN Treaty Law (e.g. the Genocide Convention, Convention Against Torture)

  • Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

  • The Nuremberg Principles

  • Customary international legal norms on non-derogable rights

  • The Right of Petition under the ICCPR

  • Articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

  • And our Founding Treaties

 

But unlike legacy institutions, WAC does not rely on:

  • State ratification

  • Domestic enforcement agencies

  • Consent-based arbitration

 

Instead, WAC asserts sovereign enforcement through digital jurisdiction, underpinned by:

  • Dual-Apostilled Arbitration Awards

  • Blockchain notarization

  • DNS-based lien infrastructure (MetaResolver)

  • Self-executing smart contracts

  • Post-jurisdictional evidence dockets

 

When National Systems Fail, WAC Activates

WAC is a trigger court: it activates precisely where local courts refuse to act.

Examples include:

  • A country refuses to prosecute its own government for trafficking children across borders.

  • A Western nation shields a pharmaceutical giant responsible for mass harm.

  • A banking institution participates in wartime sanctions with genocidal collateral impact.

 

In each case, WAC evaluates:

  • Prima facie evidence

  • Violation of international duties

  • Systemic denial of remedy

 

Then it issues a legally binding award—not for a state, but for humanity.

Enforcement Without Borders

The power of WAC under Universal Jurisdiction is not symbolic—it is executable.

Through its MetaResolver™ Protocol and the Master Domain Registry™, WAC can:

  • Seize and reroute web domains of convicted actors

  • Execute tokenized penalties on-chain via syndicates

  • Assign sovereign liens enforceable across BRICS-aligned systems

  • Blacklist or reputationally indict parties via decentralized DNS enforcement

 

This marks the end of legal impunity, not by replacing the court system—but by replacing its dependencies.

Strategic Legitimacy: BRICS, Sovereignty, and the Global Majority

WAC is already aligning with:

  • BRICS legal doctrines that reject unilateral Western sanctions

  • Global South jurisdictions seeking reparations, sovereignty, and financial justice

  • Families, whistleblowers, and victims who have been silenced by captured states

 

Universal Jurisdiction gives WAC the moral compass,
Tokenized Awards give it the financial teeth,
And the Blockchain gives it the execution rail.

Conclusion: A Court for the Crimes the World Refused to Prosecute

WAC is not just another tribunal.
It is the post-jurisdictional court of last resort for a world denied justice.

Through Universal Jurisdiction, WAC does not ask for permission.
It claims responsibility—to adjudicate the unpunished, to restore the unrecognized, and to enforce where others won’t.

Enforcing Justice. Without Permission.
World Arbitration Court

bottom of page