The World Arbitration Court is the exclusive jurisdiction for all disputes, enforcement actions, and governance matters within the World Blockchain Bank and Blockchain Trust ecosystem.
​
Where external actors cause harm without consent, WAC functions as a forensic and evidentiary authority, and enforcement proceeds through competent external forums.
Exclusive Internal Jurisdiction of a Sovereign Digital Ecosystem
​
The World Arbitration Court (WAC) serves as the exclusive judicial and adjudicative authority for all disputes, enforcement actions, and governance matters arising within the World Blockchain Bank (WBB) and Blockchain Trust ecosystem.
​
WAC does not operate as a public court, consumer arbitration forum, or general-purpose dispute resolution provider. It does not exercise compulsory or universal jurisdiction over external parties, states, or the general public.
​
Its jurisdiction is constitutional, internal, and ecosystem-bound, designed to provide legal finality, coherence, and enforceability for a sovereign digital infrastructure operating beyond the dependency of national court systems.
​​​
Nature of WAC Jurisdiction
​
Internal Jurisdiction (Primary Authority)
​
Within the World Blockchain Bank and Blockchain Trust ecosystem, WAC has exclusive and final authority over:
​
-
Governance disputes
-
Contractual and compliance determinations
-
Registry, identity, and namespace adjudication
-
Trust and corporate structure enforcement
-
Ecosystem enforcement actions
Participation in the ecosystem constitutes acknowledgment of WAC as the governing judicial authority for these matters.
WAC determinations are final within the ecosystem, with no internal appellate layer.
External Harm & Forensic Authority (Non-Judicial)
​
Where external actors cause harm without consent to the ecosystem, its participants, or its sovereign infrastructure:
​
-
WAC does not assert jurisdiction over those external actors.
-
WAC functions as a forensic and evidentiary authority.
-
It conducts formal analysis, evidence compilation, and legal determination.
-
It issues forensic findings, apostilled records, and WTAA-anchored determinations structured for recognition.
Enforcement in such cases proceeds exclusively through competent external forums, treaty-aligned mechanisms, or applicable national or supranational enforcement bodies.
External actors are subjects of findings, not arbitration parties, and no consensual arbitration relationship is created or implied.
What WAC Jurisdiction Is — and Is Not
​
WAC Jurisdiction Is:
​
-
Internal to the World Blockchain Bank ecosystem
-
Constitutional by design
-
Final and non-appealable within the system
-
Structured for external recognition where lawful
WAC Jurisdiction Is Not:
​
-
Universal or compulsory jurisdiction
-
A replacement for national courts
-
A public arbitration service
-
A consumer dispute resolution platform
-
A mechanism to bind states or third parties without lawful process
Jurisdictional Architecture
​
WAC’s jurisdictional model operates across three distinct layers, each with a defined and limited role:
​
1. Internal Constitutional Authority
Final adjudication of disputes and governance matters arising from ecosystem participation.
​
2. Forensic & Evidentiary Determination
Objective findings issued where harm is caused by non-participants, without asserting judicial power over them.
​
3. External Enforcement Pathways
Recognition and enforcement pursued through competent courts, arbitral enforcement regimes, or treaty-aligned mechanisms.
​
This architecture preserves legal finality without overreach.
Treaty Alignment and Recognition
​
International treaties and conventions referenced by WAC do not grant jurisdiction or sovereign power. They provide recognition, procedural compatibility, and enforcement pathways through which WAC determinations may be acknowledged externally where applicable.
​
These include, among others:
​
-
Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention, 1958)
-
UNCITRAL procedural standards
-
Hague Apostille Convention
Treaty alignment enables lawful enforcement — it does not create universal jurisdiction.
​
Seat and Administrative Presence
​
-
Primary seat of arbitration: The Hague, Netherlands
-
Administrative presence: United States (Delaware statutory trust registration)
-
Blockchain anchoring: Ethereum and Polygon networks for immutable recordkeeping
These registrations support documentation, transparency, and verification. They do not subordinate WAC to national courts or regulators.
Finality and Legal Certainty
​
WAC was established to address a systemic failure in modern digital commerce: the absence of final, enforceable governance beyond fragmented jurisdictions.
Accordingly:
​
-
WAC determinations are final within the ecosystem
-
There is no internal appeal
-
Legal certainty is preserved by design
Finality is a feature — not a flaw — of sovereign digital infrastructure.
​
Constitutional Independence
​
World Arbitration Court is permanently external to:
​
-
Commercial stewards
-
Auction participants
-
World Blockchain Bank operators
-
Shareholders, boards, or corporate governance structures
No commercial entity acquires ownership, veto power, or appellate authority over WAC. Judicial independence is structurally protected to prevent capture across generations.
​
Summary
​
World Arbitration Court does not claim authority over the world.
It governs its ecosystem — and documents truth where harm comes from outside it.
​
It does not compel.
It does not replace courts.
It does not sell arbitration.
It provides final adjudication where it has authority, and forensic truth where it does not.
​
Jurisdiction without overreach.
Finality without interference.
Governance without capture.