World Arbitration Court
Judicial & Adjudicative Rules

Internal Governance, Adjudication &
Forensic Determination Framework

Preamble

​

The following Judicial and Adjudicative Rules establish the internal procedural framework of the World Arbitration Court (WAC) as the exclusive judicial authority governing disputes, enforcement actions, and governance matters arising within the World Blockchain Bank (WBB) and Blockchain Trust ecosystem.

​

These Rules do not constitute an offer of public arbitration services, do not create a consensual dispute-resolution forum for external parties, and do not operate as a general commercial arbitration code. WAC’s authority is constitutional and internal, designed to provide finality, coherence, and enforceability within a sovereign digital ecosystem.

​

Participation in the World Blockchain Bank ecosystem constitutes acknowledgment of these Rules and of WAC’s authority as the governing judicial body for internal matters.

​

1. Scope and Application

 

These Rules apply exclusively to:

​

• Internal governance disputes

• Contractual and compliance determinations

• Registry, identity, namespace, and trust adjudication

• Enforcement actions arising from ecosystem participation

• Forensic determinations involving external harm to the ecosystem

 

These Rules do not apply to public consumer disputes, third-party commercial arbitration, or consensual arbitration services offered to external entities.

​

2. Nature of Proceedings

​

Proceedings conducted under these Rules may take one of two forms:

​

1. Internal Adjudication Proceedings
   Governing disputes between ecosystem participants.

2. Forensic & Evidentiary Proceedings
   Governing determinations where external actors cause harm without consent.

 

No proceeding under these Rules implies voluntary submission, consent, or contractual arbitration by an external party.

 

3. Definitions

​

• Court: The World Arbitration Court (WAC).

• Participant: Any entity operating within or contractually bound to the WBB ecosystem.

• Forensic Subject: An external actor whose conduct is subject to evidentiary determination.

• Determination: A final judicial finding issued by WAC.

• WTAA Record: A tokenized or notarized evidentiary or enforcement record.

• Adjudicative Engine: AI-assisted analytical systems used to evaluate evidence.

• Judicial Oversight Panel: Qualified human legal officers supervising proceedings.

 

4. Adjudicative Methodology (AI + Human Oversight)

​

WAC employs AI-assisted adjudicative systems to:

​

• Analyze evidence

• Identify inconsistencies

• Apply procedural logic

• Generate draft findings

 

All determinations are reviewed, supervised, and finalized by qualified human judicial officers. AI systems do not possess independent legal authority and do not issue binding rulings without human validation.

​

This structure ensures efficiency without delegating judicial authority to machines.

​

5. Commencement of Proceedings

​

Proceedings may be initiated by:

​

• Authorized ecosystem entities

• Internal governance bodies

• Designated compliance or enforcement units

 

Submissions are made through secure WAC systems and may include:

​

• Documentary evidence

• Blockchain records

• Smart-contract logs

• Financial or registry data

 

Each proceeding is assigned a unique blockchain reference hash for integrity and traceability.

​

6. Notice and Participation

​

Where notice is required, WAC may issue verified notification through:

​

• Registered electronic addresses

• Blockchain-anchored notice mechanisms

• Contractually designated channels

 

Failure or refusal to respond does not halt proceedings where jurisdiction arises internally or where forensic determination is required.

​

7. Non-Participation and Determination in Absence

​

Where a participant or forensic subject fails to participate:

​

• Proceedings may continue based on available evidence

• No adverse inference is presumed beyond the evidence

• Determinations are based solely on unrebutted prima facie facts

 

No default judgment is issued by presumption; findings rest on evidentiary sufficiency alone.

​

8. Hearings

​

Hearings, where required, may be:

​

• Documentary-only

• Virtual

• Hybrid

 

No physical appearance is required unless specifically ordered. WAC does not operate public courtrooms.

​

9. Evidence Evaluation

​

Evidence is evaluated based on:

​

• Authenticity

• Integrity

• Chain of custody

• Blockchain verification

• Consistency with governing instruments

 

All evidentiary records are preserved immutably.

​

10. Determinations and Finality

​

All determinations issued by WAC are final within the ecosystem.

There is no internal appellate process.

Finality is essential to the constitutional integrity of the system.

​

11. Forensic Findings Involving External Actors

​

Where external actors cause harm without consent:

​

• WAC issues forensic findings, not consensual arbitration awards

• Findings may be apostilled, notarized, or tokenized

• Findings are structured for external recognition and enforcement

 

Enforcement proceeds only through competent external forums and lawful mechanisms.

​

12. International Recognition Framework

​

Where applicable, determinations are structured for compatibility with:

​

• The New York Convention (1958)

• UNCITRAL procedural standards

• Hague Apostille Convention

 

These instruments enable recognition, not universal jurisdiction or compulsory submission.

​

13. Asset Measures

​

WAC does not seize assets or command institutions directly.

​

Where determinations warrant protective measures, WAC may:

​

• Recommend asset preservation

• Issue evidentiary certifications

• Support lawful enforcement actions through external authorities

 

14. Sovereign Immunity

​

These Rules do not purport to waive sovereign immunity, override national law, or compel state action.

References to international norms serve procedural and evidentiary alignment purposes only.

​

15. Transparency and Recordkeeping

​

All proceedings are:

​

• Logged immutably

• Time-stamped

• Cryptographically verifiable

 

Access is restricted to authorized parties.

​

16. Confidentiality

​

Proceedings are confidential by default.

Public disclosure occurs only where required for lawful enforcement or compliance.

​

17. Fees

​

Where internal administrative fees apply, they are governed by separate ecosystem schedules and are not public arbitration pricing structures.

​

18. Amendments

​

These Rules may be amended to reflect:

​

• Legal developments

• Technological evolution

• Governance requirements

 

All amendments are versioned and recorded immutably.

​

19. Governing Principle

​

These Rules exist to ensure:

​

• Legal certainty

• Procedural integrity

• Enforcement readiness

• Institutional continuity

 

They are not designed to replace courts, regulators, or public justice systems.

​

Final Statement

​

World Arbitration Court does not sell justice.
It does not market dispute resolution.
It does not compete with courts.

It provides final adjudication inside a sovereign digital system, and forensic truth where harm occurs outside it.

​

Finality without capture.
Justice without dependency.
Governance without appeal.