Powers and Authority of the Court

Judicial Powers Within a Sovereign Digital Ecosystem

The World Arbitration Court (WAC) exercises defined, constitutional powers exclusively within the World Blockchain Bank (WBB) and Blockchain Trust ecosystem. These powers are designed to ensure finality, governance integrity, and enforceability within a sovereign digital infrastructure, while remaining legally bounded, non-coercive, and non-capturable.

WAC does not operate as a public court, regulator, or global enforcement agency. It does not assert compulsory jurisdiction over states, external corporations, or individuals. Its authority is internal by design, and forensic by necessity where external harm occurs.

WORLD ARBITRATION COURT-THE SUPRANATIONAL ARBITRATION AUTHORITY

Core Powers of the World Arbitration Court

1. Exclusive Internal Adjudicative Authority

WAC possesses exclusive authority to adjudicate all disputes, governance matters, and enforcement actions arising within the World Blockchain Bank ecosystem, including:

Internal contractual disputes
Governance and compliance determinations
Registry, identity, and namespace adjudication
Trust and corporate structure enforcement
Ecosystem rule interpretation

These determinations are final within the ecosystem and are not subject to internal appeal.

2. Constitutional Governance Oversight

WAC serves as the judicial guardian of the ecosystem’s constitutional framework, ensuring that:

No commercial actor exceeds delegated authority
Governance rules are applied consistently
Enforcement actions remain procedurally lawful
Judicial independence is preserved

This power exists to prevent commercial capture, regulatory substitution, or political interference.

WORLD_ARBITRATION_COURT_The_Supranational_Authority

3. Forensic and Evidentiary Authority (External Harm)

Where external actors cause harm without consent to the ecosystem or its participants, WAC exercises forensic authority, not judicial power over those actors.

This includes the power to:

Conduct formal forensic analysis
Compile and authenticate evidence
Issue evidentiary findings and legal determinations
Generate apostilled and blockchain-anchored records
Create WTAA-linked evidentiary instruments

These findings are designed for recognition and enforcement by competent external forums, not unilateral execution by WAC.

4. Determination and Certification Power

WAC has authority to:

Issue final determinations within its jurisdiction
Certify findings, records, and outcomes
Apostille qualifying documents
Anchor determinations immutably on-chain

Certification does not imply compulsory power; it ensures integrity, authenticity, and enforceability.

5. Procedural Rulemaking Authority (Internal)

WAC may promulgate, amend, and enforce internal judicial rules and procedures governing:

Adjudication processes
Evidence handling
Oversight mechanisms
Enforcement coordination

These rules apply only within the ecosystem and do not bind external parties.

6. Enforcement Coordination Authority

WAC does not seize assets, issue arrest orders, or compel institutions directly.

Where enforcement is required, WAC may:

Structure determinations for treaty-aligned recognition
Coordinate with lawful external enforcement mechanisms
Support claims through certified evidentiary records
Monitor compliance outcomes

Enforcement occurs through competent courts, arbitral enforcement regimes, or lawful authorities, not by WAC fiat.

7. AI-Assisted Adjudication Authority (Supervised)

WAC may employ AI-assisted analytical systems to:

Evaluate evidence
Identify inconsistencies
Assist legal reasoning

All AI outputs are reviewed and finalized by qualified human judicial officers. AI systems do not exercise independent judicial authority.

8. Recordkeeping and Transparency Authority

WAC maintains authority to:

Preserve immutable judicial records
Assign cryptographic hashes to determinations
Maintain transparent audit trails
Protect sensitive data through cryptographic controls

This ensures long-term integrity without public exposure of confidential matters.

9. Finality Authority

WAC possesses the authority to declare matters finally resolved within the ecosystem.

There is:

No internal appellate body
No commercial override
No shareholder veto

Finality is essential to the system’s legal stability.

What the Court Does Not Have Power To Do

For clarity and legal certainty, WAC explicitly does not have authority to:

Exercise universal or compulsory jurisdiction
Bind states or third parties without lawful process
Replace national courts
Act as a regulator or law enforcement agency
Seize assets or impose sanctions unilaterally
Offer public or consumer arbitration services

Any enforcement beyond the ecosystem occurs only through lawful external mechanisms.

Treaty Alignment and Legal Recognition

International treaties and conventions referenced by WAC:

Do not grant sovereign power
Do not confer universal jurisdiction

They provide recognition, procedural compatibility, and enforcement pathways for determinations lawfully issued within WAC’s internal authority.

Institutional Independence

World Arbitration Court is permanently independent from:

Commercial stewards
Auction participants
World Blockchain Bank operators
Shareholders or boards

No entity acquires control, veto power, or appellate authority over the Court.

Summary

World Arbitration Court does not rule the world.

It rules the World Blockchain Bank ecosystem.

It does not compel outsiders.
It documents truth where harm occurs.

It does not enforce by force.
It enables enforcement by law.

Power without overreach.
Authority without capture.
Finality without coercion.

Powers and Authority of the Court

Judicial Powers Within a Sovereign Digital Ecosystem

Core Powers of the World Arbitration Court